Profile aqua_pulse_sm_clr.gif (973 octets) Wastewater treament Equipment References Consulting Business Co-operation Feedback

Cost Comparison SBR vs CAS

Home

Eco Process & equipement intl inc
aqua_pulse_sm_clr.gif (973 octets) SBR ,
Sequencing Batch Reactor
Trickling Filter Aerated Lagoon Wastewater treatment applications

Represented Equipment

Our technical objectives Our SBR preferred process Our SBR family development Nutrient Removal Our design approach
Our SBR equipment Our process control aqua_pulse_sm_clr.gif (973 octets) SBR, the client's best choice Our clients testimonies Partial list of SBR installations SBR, a technology in evolution  
  Process Features Process comparison

aqua_pulse_sm_clr.gif (973 octets) Cost

 
  1. SPACE SAVINGS
  • WB01515_.gif (482 octets)20% to 50% space savings is normally achived.
  1. OPERATION SAVINGS
  • Energy savings due to intelligent operation.
  • Reduced operator attention while improving treatment quality and reliability.
  1. CONSTRUCTION SAVINGS
  • BS00005A.gif (2466 octets)20% overall savings is an average figure when apples are compared to apples.
  1. MAINTENANCE SAVINGS
  • Utilizes the most simple modern and reliable equipment.
    Eliminates the conventional equipment with many wearing parts.