Profile aqua_pulse_sm_clr.gif (973 octets) Wastewater treament Equipment References Consulting Business Co-operation Feedback

SBR vs RBC

Home

disque_caric.jpg (74552 octets)
aqua_pulse_sm_clr.gif (973 octets) SBR ,
Sequencing Batch Reactor
Trickling Filter Aerated Lagoon Wastewater treatment applications

Represented Equipment

Our technical objectives Our SBR preferred process Our SBR family development Nutrient Removal Our design approach
Our SBR equipment Our process control aqua_pulse_sm_clr.gif (973 octets) SBR, the client's best choice Our clients testimonies Partial list of SBR installations SBR, a technology in evolution  
  Process Features aqua_pulse_sm_clr.gif (973 octets) Process comparison Cost  
Flow Diagram Process Advantages SBR vs CAS aqua_pulse_sm_clr.gif (973 octets) SBR vs RBC US EPA Evaluation
Description RBC SBR
External clarifiers and piping Requires clarifiers & piping (primary & secondary) Not required
Digester Required Not required with extended aeration loading
Cover/building over reactor Required Not required
Biomass characteristics Un-controlled biomass formation
No control over the filamentous bacteria
Improved. Lower SVI. Control over the filamentous bacteria. Desirable balance obtained between zoogloea and filamentous bacteria
BOD removal 80-90% 90-95% plus
Phosphorus removal Not possible biologically
Need chemical coagulation
Integrated in the sequence. No chemical required
Nitrification Possible if RBC capacity is doubled up with separate treatment units Integrated in the sequence
Denitrification Not possible or need separate basins with methanol addition Possible without methanol addition
  • Credit in oxygen
  • Credit in power
  • Higher water quality
Sludge age 0.5 to 3 days 20 to 30 days
Sludge production 1.0-2.0 lbs/lb BOD removed at its maximum.
Primary & secondary unstabilized sludges plus chemical sludge
0.5-1.0 lb/lb BOD removed at its minimum
  • No primary sludge
  • No digester required
  • Secondary sludge generated only
Sludge disposal More sludge to be disposed
Chemical sludge generation with potential environmental problems
Minimum sludge generated
No chemical sludge
Biological sludge only
No disposal problem
Chemical feed equipment required for phosphorus removal Not required unless as back-up
Process characterization Attached biomass on media Suspended biomass
Treatment status
  • Mainly BOD removal
  • Nitrification/separate treatment
Advanced treatment
  • BOD removal
  • Nitrification
  • Denitrification
  • Biological phosphorus removal
Process classification
  • High rate
  • Quick/uncontrolled substrate absorpsion
  • No integrated sludge digestion
  • Low and medium loading per design selection
  • Extended aeration
  • Sludge digestion incorporated
  • Fully controlled process
Historical status Extensive history of chronical mechanical breakages e.g.
  • Media
  • Shafts
  • Bearings
  • Sucessfull history
  • Latest breakthrough technology
  • High reliability equipment
Process biological pattern Plug flow True plug flow
Process design modelling Not available Available
Mass balance approach using specific biokinetic coefficients
Equalisation No equalization provided
Equalization recommended
Self-equalized capacity during peak loads
Aerated capacity Fixed Variable to accomodate peak loads
Controls Simple (no provess control)
Simple automatic timers
Operation/ maintenance Several reactors
Rotors & drives, bearing, chains
Clarifiers & drives
Transfert pumps & piping
Digesters & aeration equipement
Simple single tank process
Less mechanical equipment
Less maintenance
Overall cost
civil mechanical, operation
More Less
Power Process: less
Digester: more
Overall: less (generally)
Process: more
Digester: less
Overall: more (generally)